Legal Opinion
Cranmore v. State
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 2, 1978No. 77-384-CRPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDecker, C.J.
These criminal actions arose from the same incidents, were tried together, present numerous identical issues on appeal and were, therefore, consolidated for appeal purposes.
The three plaintiffs in error (hereinafter defendants), Robert Allen Cranmore, Brian Curtis Rolf and Patrick Rogers (the fourth defendant who is referred to in the opinion, Robert Prihoda, escaped from custody subsequent to his commitment to the Wisconsin State Prison System and is not a party to this appeal) were convicted by a jury of one count of first-degree murder, contrary to secs. 940.01 and 939.05, Stats. In…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Robert Prihoda v. Gary R. McCaughtry Warden, Waupun Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- State v. AllesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Muller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. DrogsvoldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.