Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1929No. 12199Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

on motion for rehearing. ,

HAWKINS, Judge.

— In its motion for rehearing the state sets out the evidence given by Fred Clark upon a hearing of the motion for new trial, and relies upon such testimony in connection with the other matters discussed in the original opinion as justifying the trial court in determining that if Walling, the absent witness, testified as expected his evidence would not be true. It is insisted that the court’s finding upon the matter should not be disturbed. No affidavit of Walling was attached to the motion. Clark was night watchman in the town of Amherst. Upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Attaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Steel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API