Legal Opinion
Nakashima v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 2007No. 26,155PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiffs breach of contract claim. Plaintiff represents a yet-uncertified class of automobile insurance policyholders who elected to pay their automobile insurance premiums in installments. Defendant is an automobile insurance company that entered into a contract with Plaintiff to provide insurance for her automobile. Plaintiff argues that the installment fees charged to those policyholders who pay their premiums in installments are considered part of the premium and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Battishill v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ferrell v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Christy v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Rivera-Platte v. First Colony Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.