Legal Opinion
Lamontagne v. Musano, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 5, 2000No. AC 19211PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Robert LaMontagne, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court granting his motion for counsel fees and costs in an amount substantially less than he sought. The plaintiff claims that the court abused its discretion by (1) awarding only a small fraction of his actual costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-251a,1 and (2) focusing on inappropriate factors in determining the *62amount of costs and fees to award. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court made the following findings of fact. The plaintiff was employed for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burns v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Moffitt v. HorriganConnecticut Superior Court · 1982
- Gerhard v. VeresConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by16 opinions
- Steiner v. Lewmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Heller v. D. W. Fish Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Chioffi v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- New England Custom Concrete, LLC v. CarboneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.