in Re Ford Motor Company
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Boyd
For the most part, I agree with the Court’s construction of section 71.051 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code in this case, and I generally disagree with Justice Johnson’s conclusion that the Court “errs by reading language into the statute.” Ante at 284 (Johnson, J., dissenting). But I agree with Justice Johnson’s conclusion that the Court “errs by misapprehending the interests of the inter-venors,” id., and with his forum non conve-niens analysis, so I too dissent, but for slightly different reasons.
The issue in this case is whether the intervenors, who are Texas residents, are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Perkins v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank in DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Corzelius v. Cosby Producing & Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.