Legal Opinion · Dissent

in Re Ford Motor Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2014No. 12-0957Published

1DissentJustice Boyd

For the most part, I agree with the Court’s construction of section 71.051 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code in this case, and I generally disagree with Justice Johnson’s conclusion that the Court “errs by reading language into the statute.” Ante at 284 (Johnson, J., dissenting). But I agree with Justice Johnson’s conclusion that the Court “errs by misapprehending the interests of the inter-venors,” id., and with his forum non conve-niens analysis, so I too dissent, but for slightly different reasons.

The issue in this case is whether the intervenors, who are Texas residents, are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Perkins v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank in DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Corzelius v. Cosby Producing & Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API