Legal Opinion
Fortune v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 29, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01245Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ eee eee ex TAMMY FORTUNE, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 20-CV-1245 (EK) -against- COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. eee ee ey ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Tammy Fortune, proceeding pro se, seeks judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s decision to deny her claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings. For the following reasons, I grant the motion. I. Background A. Procedural History Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moran v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Poupore v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Paul E. Dumas v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.