Legal Opinion

Molony v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 3, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wapello Circuit Court. Action to recover oue-balf of the cost of what the plaintiff claims to be a party wall. The defendant pleaded a counterclaim. Trial by jury, judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

i. party wail: coveryioruse of-: measure of damages, I. In 1880 the plaintiff purchased of the defendant and J. G. Hutchinson a lot in the city of Ottumwa, upon which the plaintiff agreed to erect a two-story brick building: and it was further agreed . ° ° between said parties that when the defendant constructed a building on the adjoining lot he would construct, in connection with the plaintiff’s building, a stairway to the second story, of the usual width, and to be constructed in the usual manner, one-half of which should be on the ground of each party. The plaintiff erected her building,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bertram v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Zugenbuhler v. GilliamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. First Nat. Bldg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sheldon Bank v. RoyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Huston v. deZengMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Pier v. SalotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Younker v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API