Legal Opinion
Louisville Water Co. v. Wells
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 24, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWERTON, Judge.
The Louisville Water Company appeals from a summary judgment in the Jefferson Circuit Court requiring it to comply with the prevailing wage provisions of KRS Chapter 337. The primary question we must determine is whether the term “city,” as used in KRS 337.010{3)(e), includes agencies or municipally-owned corporations such as the Louisville Water Company. If we conclude that the company is included in the term “city,” it will be exempt from paying the prevailing wage rate requirements in its expansion project; but, if we determine that the company is not a “city” within the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. WeddingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Dolan v. Louisville Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Hardin Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
- McIntosh v. Electric & Water Plant BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
3Cited by10 opinions
- Collins v. Commonwealth Natural Resources & Environmental Protection CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Palmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
- Messick v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1999
- Central Kentucky Drying Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Housing, Buildings, & ConstructionKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
- Collins v. COM. OF KY. NAT. RESOURCESKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.