Bartoli v. Huguenard
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from tlie Twenty-fourth District Court, Parish of Plaque-mines. íávcmdcvis, J'. 1. Revenues of paraphernal property of either spouse, during marriage, form pare of the community, when the husband has had the administration of the same.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from tlie Twenty-fourth District Court, Parish of Plaque-mines. íávcmdcvis, J'. 1. Revenues of paraphernal property of either spouse, during marriage, form pare of the community, when the husband has had the administration of the same. R. C. C. 2386, 2402, 2406; 16 L.l; 17 L.296; 19 L.574; 3 Ann. 611; 4 Ann. 248; 6 Ann. 634. 2. The wife and her heirs and assigns have the privilege of exonerating themselves from the debts contracted during the niarriage. by renouncing the partnership or community of gains. R.C. C.2410. 3. The wife who renounces loses every sort of right to the effects…
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss
The opinion of tlie Court was delivered by
Poché, J.
The ground of tlie motion is error in the return day, imputable to appellant.
The order of appeal bears date October 16, 1885, and the appeal is made returnable on the first Monday of December following; to the order is added the statement, “there not being time to prepare the transcript for tlie next ensuing term.”
Tt is contended,'And it is not denied, that the return day was suggested by appellant’s counsel. The question is therefore tlie alleged error of the return day.
The law of the case is Act No. 45 of the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Dilzell Engineering & Construction Co. v. LehmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Tomme v. TommeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- MacKenroth v. PelkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931