Legal Opinion

Mulder v. Donaldson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, *135New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered October 15, 1998, which granted defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs jury demand, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as the money damages that defendant seeks in some of its counterclaims will not protect it from plaintiffs continued use of allegedly confidential information and documents, it is clear that the thrust of defendant’s counterclaims, the only claims remaining to be litigated, is equitable in nature, and thus plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial (see, Downtown Art Co. v Zimmerman, 227 AD2d 226).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Downtown Art Co. v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krulwich v. PosnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API