City of Milwaukee v. Wroten
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentSteinmetz, J.
The majority holds that a municipal court in Wisconsin has the authority to declare a municipal ordinance unconstitutional. The majority also holds that city of Milwaukee ordinance 2-138 (1979) is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face. Because I disagree with the majority's analysis and conclusions, I dissent. I would reverse the decision of the circuit court.
Municipal courts in Wisconsin are not constitutional courts;1 rather, they are the product of legislative enactment.2 As such, they have no jurisdiction except that which is conferred upon them by statute. While it may be presumed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.