Legal Opinion

Eric Ring v. Daniel Leighton v. Clinton McGaw

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 22, 2019No. Docket: Pen-17-549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶1] On February 8, 2016, Clinton McGaw, driving a vehicle owned by Eric Ring, was on his way to pick up a customer in furtherance of Ring's business when he was involved in a collision with a vehicle driven by Daniel Leighton. In a small claims matter filed by Leighton against McGaw, the District Court (Lincoln, Stitham, J. ) found that McGaw was negligent and awarded Leighton just over $3,900 in damages and costs. No appeal was filed and the judgment was paid. Ring then filed a complaint in the Superior Court asserting that Leighton was negligent and had caused Ring economic harm. Ring…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ela v. PelletierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Heidi Pushard v. Bank of America N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Thomas v. BFC Marine/Bath Fuel Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Caporino v. LacasseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. Midland Funding LLC v. WaltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ronald White v. Real Deal Auto Sales & Service Center, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  2. BURR v. BOUFFARDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
  3. Eric Ring v. Daniel Leighton v. Clinton McGawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  4. WILMINGTON TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR MFRA TRUST 2015-1 v. HOWEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API