Look v. C. A. Watson & Sons
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Action of assumpsit upon account annexed. Defendant filed plea of general issue, also brief statement. At close of evidence presiding Justice directed verdict for plaintiff, to which ruling exceptions were filed. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Case stated in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.
John H. Look brings this action of assumpsit on account annexed against C. A. Watson, R. A. Watson and George Watson, as co-partners under the name of C. A. Watson & Sons. A check is also declared upon but not printed. The case comes to the Law Court upon exceptions to the ruling of the presiding Justice directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
The defendants allege and prove that “C. A. Watson & Sons” is the name of a corporation. This fact is not decisive. It is not very material unless it also appears that the dealings involved in this action were between the plaintiff and that corporation.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haug v. HaugIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Herman Kahn Co. v. BowdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Rice v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Cirkel v. CroswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Wm. Harris & Son v. B. D. CraryTexas Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wright v. BubarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Howard v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959