Legal Opinion

Red Top Mercury Mines, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1989No. 88-4270PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the order of the district court entered on September 19, 1988, in the District of Alaska, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of this case.

We adopt the district court’s eighteen-page analysis as appended, finding it dispositive of all issues on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

APPENDIX

Plaintiff, Red Top Mercury Mines, Inc., brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 seeking judicial review of the decisions of the Department of the Interior as rendered by the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) in Red Top Mercury Mines, Inc., 96 I.B.L.A. 391…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alexander Hebrard v. Jeremy NofzigerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenny CONWAY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Alex Wayne Bolt v. United States of America, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Ptarmigan Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Hiram B. Webb v. Manuel LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Brenton Lee CarneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API