Legal Opinion

Meth v. Schloss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The failure of plaintiff to specify the matters as to which an examination before trial of defendants-respondents is sought warranted a denial of the motion. (Bamberger v. Cooke, 181 App. Div. 805.) We think, however, that the denial of the application should have been without prejudice to a renewal thereof.

The objections interposed by plaintiff to the account of respondents as filed raised issues for trial before the learned referee. Plaintiff is entitled to examine as to some of the matters. Thus, plaintiff should be permitted to inquire as to the claim that in making investments in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bamberger v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milbeck Apartments, Inc. v. Corby Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Hale v. St. Vincent's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Union Circulation Co. v. Hardel Publishers Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API