Legal Opinion
Karras v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 25, 2002No. 99CV0996BTMJAHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Defendants Teledyne Industries and Teledyne Holdings, LLC (collectively, “TDY”) filed this motion for summary judgment on August 23, 2001. For the reasons discussed below, TDY’s motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This is an action for recovery of clean up costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Plaintiffs are Stath Karras, as Trustee of the Chatham Site PRP Group Trust Fund and Stath Karras, as Trustee of the Chatham Site PRP Group RAP Trust Fund…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Estate of Migliaccio v. Midland National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- 68th Street Site Work Group v. Airgas, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021