Rojek v. Kuskowski

Epitomized Opinion

By a written contract Rojek agreed to purcnase certain land from Kuskowski through one Olszew-ski, a co-defendant. Kuskowski deeded the land to Olszewski receiving from Olszewski an instrument Hating that said deed was given solely to facilitate the transfer to Rojek, that Olszewski had not paid for said land and was to pay to Kuskowski what money he should receive from Rojek. Olszewski was also to receive a commission for the sale of the property from Kuskowski. Rojek paid the amount, of money specified by the contract to Olszewski who absconded. The question now arises as…