Legal Opinion

Clendenen v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1932No. 1012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus made by the relator against the respondent, as county clerk of Comanche county, to compel the latter to prepare and deliver to relator or his attorney a transcript of the proceedings in a cause tried in the county court of Comanche county, wherein W. L. Tatum was plaintiff and the relator was defendant. In that cause judgment was rendered against relator, and he is seeking to bring that judgment to this court for review. In due time after the judgment was rendered relator made his affidavit of inability to pay costs or to give security…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pendley v. Berry & TowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hart v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Black v. SnedecorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Heard v. PearmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAfee v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Westergren v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Cobet v. TreaccarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API