Legal Opinion

M.M. v. M.P.S.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 1989No. 89-265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants challenge an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice. Appellants filed an action against appellees to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress and conspiracy. The complaint alleged that appellants suffered severe emotional distress when M.P.S. told them that he had sexually abused their daughter and that his wife had supplied her with illegal drugs from the time she was eight years old, throughout her childhood, until she was 23 years old.1 Appellants sought recovery solely for their own distress; 2 but the trial court dismissed their complaint for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McCarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. SheehanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Habelow v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Crenshaw v. SARASOTA CTY. PUB. HOSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. King v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of MinneolaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Ford v. RowlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  4. Baker v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. In re Standard Jury Instructions—Civil Cases No. 94-1Supreme Court of Florida · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API