Tyden v. Ohio Table Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
EURTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit for alleged infringement of two patents, one issued to C. Wilhelm, August 11, 1903, and the other to E. Tyden, June 4, 1901. The Wilhelm patent has been assigned to Tyden. Both patents are for improvements in locking device for “pedestal tables.” It is averred that the claims sued upon, being claims 1 and 2 of the Wilhelm patent, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, and 16 of the Tyden patent, are capable of conjoint use, and that same have been so conjointly used by the defendants, who are operating under two later patents, one of October 16, 1904, to J. F. Arnold for…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Davis Sewing Mach. Co. v. New Departure Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- William B. Mershon & Co. v. Bay City Box & Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1910
- In re TuckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Lester v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Arnold v. TydenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.