Legal Opinion

Mull v. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1907No. 20,902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom Rush Circuit Court; Will M. Sparks, Judge. Condemnation proceeding by the Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Company against Leonidas II. Mull. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was commenced by appellee against appellant, to condemn land for a proposed electrical line, consisting of poles and wires, for the transmission of electricity from its power-house in Rushville to a station in Shelbyville, where such electricity is to be reduced in voltage and used for lighting and for motive power in operating an interurban railroad extending from Indianapolis to Shelbyville, and its proposed extension to Greensburg, when completed.

Appellant appeared in response to notice, and filed objections to the proceeding, in substance, as follows: (1) That appellee has no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Maule Coal Co. v. PartenheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Mayor of Worcester v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Heick v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Devening v. BartholomewIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. ClosserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bullock v. BillheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API