Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Pataki

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 2006No. 04-3886-Published

1Opinion of the Court

449 F.3d 305

Joseph HAYDEN, on behalf of himself and all individuals similarly situated; Lumumba Akinwole-Bandelle, Wilson Andino, Gina Arias, Wanda Best-Deveaux, Carlos Bristol, Augustine Carmona, David Galarza, Kimalee Garner, Mark Graham, Keran Holmes, III, Chaujuantheyia Lochard, Steven Mangual, Jamel Massey, Stephen Ramon, Nilda Rivera, Lillian M. Rivera, Mario Romero, Jessica Sanclemente, Paul Satterfield and Barbara Scott, on behalf of themselves and all individuals similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

George PATAKI, Governor of the State of New York; Carol Berman, Chairperson,…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment · Straub; Concurring in the judgment · Sack; Concurrence · Raggi; Concurrence · Jacobs; Dissent · Calabresi; Dissent · Sotomayor; Dissent · Katzmann; Per curiam.

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API