Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Allen

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1934No. L. A. 14730PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

A petition for hearing in this case was granted in order that further consideration be given to the appellant’s contention that the referees, in fixing the amount of damages to be awarded to the appellant, incorrectly computed the value of the strip of land to be taken for the purpose of widening Santa Monica Boulevard. Upon such further consideration of the facts and the arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One, prepared by Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey, correctly disposes of the main questions presented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Widening of Fulton StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Deer Valley Industrial Park Development & Lease Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. City of Fresno v. CloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API