Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Pony Express Courier Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 8110UC1086Published

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

On this appeal of an administrative agency decision, we must determine the scope of appellate review based on the questions presented by the parties. Utilities Commission v. Oil Company, 302 N.C. 14, 21, 273 S.E. 2d 232, 236 (1981). The arguments raised *219by Pony Express are (1) whether the Commission found sufficient facts to support its conclusions; and (2) whether there was competent, material and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that supporting shippers had need for a specific type of service not otherwise available by existing means of transportation.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina Savings & Loan League v. North Carolina Credit Union CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Petroleum Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Wachovia Courier Corp. v. American Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & First Courier Corp. v. American Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API