Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Lee Young
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1994No. 92-50731PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Charles Lee Young, and his codefendants William Forry and Daniel Dean Bryan, appeal their convictions and sentences for methamphetamine trafficking. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Young argues primarily that the district court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on the government’s use of false evidence against him. 1 We agree and reverse.
I
On November 21, 1991, at approximately five a.m., Riverside County deputy sheriffs executed a warrant to search a certain residence in Quail Valley, California. The search uncovered a fully functional methamphetamine laboratory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HavensSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Leroy GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Gloria Killian v. Susan Poole, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Clarence Ray Allen v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.