Legal Opinion

Bloom v. City of Xenia

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Greene county.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Wendell Bloom was prosecuted, under an ordinance of the town of Xenia, which prohibited ale, beer, and porter-houses and shops, etc. The defense made by Bloom, which we shall consider here, was, that the ordinance in question was not properly passed, and was therefore a nullity.

At a meeting of the town council of Xenia, held September 27, 1869, there were six members present, eight being the full number. The ordinance committee reported two ordinances, one relating to elections, and the other, being the one in question, to prohibit ale, beer, and porterhouses and shops, etc. The rules were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cannon v. HemphillTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Minturn v. LarueSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. People Ex Rel. McConvill v. HillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Giddings v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Morrison v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API