Legal Opinion

Connick v. Thompson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 29, 2011No. 09-571PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office now concedes that, in prosecuting respondent John Thompson for attempted armed robbery, prosecutors failed to disclose evidence that should have been turned over to the defense under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963). Thompson was convicted. Because of that conviction Thompson elected not to testify in his own defense in his later trial for murder, and he was again convicted. Thompson spent 18 years in prison, including 14 years on death row. One month before Thompson’s scheduled execution, his investigator discovered the undisclosed evidence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donald Koithahn v. Pettus, Troy Hershberger, ButlerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  2. Sullivan Walter v. City of New Orleans, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  3. Yursil Kidwai, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API