Legal Opinion

Napatco, Inc. v. Lefkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 9, 1976, which denied petitioner’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum, reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and motion granted. The Attorney-General, pursuant to his powers under subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law, served a subpoena duces tecum upon appellant Napatco. The subpoena required Napatco to appear for examination before the *743Attorney-General with virtually all of its records. Raymond Lee, Napatco’s president, submitted an affidavit in support of the motion to quash. He stated that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Matter of A'hearn v. Comm. on Unlawful Practice of the Law of the New York County Lawyers'ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Raymond Lee Organization, Inc. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API