Napatco, Inc. v. Lefkowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 9, 1976, which denied petitioner’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum, reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and motion granted. The Attorney-General, pursuant to his powers under subdivision 12 of section 63 of the Executive Law, served a subpoena duces tecum upon appellant Napatco. The subpoena required Napatco to appear for examination before the *743Attorney-General with virtually all of its records. Raymond Lee, Napatco’s president, submitted an affidavit in support of the motion to quash. He stated that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of A'hearn v. Comm. on Unlawful Practice of the Law of the New York County Lawyers'ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gardner v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Raymond Lee Organization, Inc. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978