State ex rel. Jones v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator asserts that the present delay in the Court of Common Pleas is violative of due process and equal protection and is severely prejudicial to him. However, relator is not languishing in jail, and the necessity for forced speed is not evident. While the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees a speedy trial, no such requirement attaches to proceedings subsequent to trial, primarily because the presumption of innocence at the trial level does not exist at the appellate or post-appellate levels. Speedy trial was originally guaranteed (1) to prevent oppressive…
2Cited by13 opinions
- City of Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Brecksville v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.