Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Adams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 7, 1887No. 1203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiffs, defendant sued out this writ of' error. The case is stated, in the opinion of the court. ' •

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, on September 25, 1885, the plaintiffs being executors of Jacob Harmon, deceased, citizens of Indiana, and the defendants citizens of Illinois. -The action was founded on a promissory note signed by the defendants, dated March 1, 1875, payable one year after date to 'the order of Jacob Harmon, for $15,000, with, interest at ten per cent, per annum, from date until paid, with a proviso that if the note was collected by suit the judgment should include a reasonable fee for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. HarmonU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1892
  2. United States v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  3. Harman v. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API