Legal Opinion

Lemunyon v. Newcomb

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1929No. 21240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Catherine Lemunyon brought an action against the executor of her deceased father’s estate, seeking to recover $1400, in round figures, for 172 days work as housekeeper at $7 per week, six weeks nursing at $10 per week, and $165 as her father’s share of groceries and other supplies purchased while she was living in her father’s home. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and judgment was entered accordingly. The Court of Appeals affirmed this judgment. Catherine Lemunyon prosecutes error to this court.

It is claimed that the trial court committed prejudicial error…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kroeger v. RyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Markland v. HarleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Moore v. CurtzweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Scheetz, Admr. v. ScheetzOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API