Legal Opinion

Stokely v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 4, 1915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Heard before Hon. John H. Miller. Action by Mary H. Stokely against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, on an insurance policy. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff, wbo takes this appeal, sued defendant on a policy of insurance by which defendant insured John Arthur Haire against “bodily injury sustained * * * through accidental means * * * and resulting directly, independently, and exclusively of all other causes * * * in death.” After all the evidence was in, the trial court gave the general affirmative charge on defendant’s request. Hence this appeal.

The evidence may be fairly stated as follows: During the life of the policy the assured was sick of appendicitis. He submitted himself to an operation by which his appendix was removed. The…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Kerns v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. White v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API