Pierre v. Chemical Bank
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:
I.Introduction
Plaintiff alleges denial of his right to equal employment opportunity while working at Chemical Bank. N.Y.S. Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 296. Defendants move for summary judgment. Only one matter warrants discussion — their contention that filing a complaint with the New York City Commission on Human Rights constituted a binding election not to sue even though the City Commission was not competent to hear the case. This issue appears to be a matter of first impression.
No election of remedies took place because the City…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vincent MOODIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Chachra v. Katharine Gibbs School Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robles v. Cox & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Orendorff v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge No. 96New York Supreme Court · 2003