Legal Opinion

Pierre v. Chemical Bank

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 13, 1997No. 94 CV 3297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Order

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:

I.Introduction

Plaintiff alleges denial of his right to equal employment opportunity while working at Chemical Bank. N.Y.S. Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 296. Defendants move for summary judgment. Only one matter warrants discussion — their contention that filing a complaint with the New York City Commission on Human Rights constituted a binding election not to sue even though the City Commission was not competent to hear the case. This issue appears to be a matter of first impression.

No election of remedies took place because the City…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vincent MOODIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Chachra v. Katharine Gibbs School Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robles v. Cox & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. Orendorff v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge No. 96New York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API