Legal Opinion

Alkalaj v. Alkalaj

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Plaintiff moves for an order pursuant to sections 245, 245-a and 245-b of the Civil Practice Act permitting her to serve a supplemental complaint setting forth facts which occurred after the commencement of the action. In this action plaintiff sues to recover sums due under a separation agreement entered into in Vienna, Austria, in March, 1938. The complaint seeks the recovery of sums which are alleged to have come due between January, 1939, and April, 1946.

Defendant being a nonresident, the action was commenced by attaching a bank account of defendant in this State. Thereafter defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olcott v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Osborn v. White Eagle Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Mendoza v. MendozaNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API