Legal Opinion

Miller v. Sohns

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section, in this case because it involves the Uniform Contribution Among Tort Feasors Act: the particular question being whether the Act could be applied retroactively under the facts of this case.

Sohns filed suit for personal injury and property damage against Miller, Jurich and Phelps, after a three-car accident involving the parties, in which Sohns was injured.

On August 21, 1968, immediately prior to trial Sohns entered into a covenant not to sue with defendants Phelps and Jurichi in consideration of their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. PoundsTennessee Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hannum v. McInturfTennessee Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aherron v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Estate of Bell v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Doe v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Estate of Bell v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Estate of Bell v. Shelby County Health Care Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API