Legal Opinion

Hardaway v. Withrow

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 21, 2001No. 2:98-cv-75294PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

TARNOW, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND.700

II. STANDARD OF REVIEW.703

III. DISCUSSION.703

Claim # I. Petitioner was denied a fair trial as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments by the prosecutor’s improper cross-examination of the petitioner which infringed on petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel and the attorney-client privilege.703

Claim # II. Petitioner’s right to due process was violated by the trial court’s failure to properly instruct the jury on the elements of second degree…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickens v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  2. Meade v. LavigneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Dion Hardaway, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Pamela Withrow, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Terry v. BockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Taylor v. WithrowDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API