Legal Opinion

Barnett v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The suspension of petitioner’s retail liquor license in Binghamton is based on a charge that a bottle of liqueur was sold on December 9, 1950, to a boy who three days before had become seventeen years of age. This is a violation of statute (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 65).

The boy was then 5 feet 8% inches tall and weighed 144 pounds, but if he was “ actually ” under eighteen years of age a violation occurred. What he may have appeared to be is no defense. Every licensee has the statutory responsibility of seeing to it that sales of alcoholic beverages are not made to persons less than…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Erin Wine & Liquor Store, Inc. v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. State v. WinterMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. Teetsel, New York County Courts1958
  4. Thibodeaux v. City of SulphurLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Ward v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API