Legal Opinion

Van Diest v. Yakima County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1937No. 26418. En BancPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Pursuant to the powers granted by Bern. Bev. Stat., §3997-6 [P. C. §1652-6], the county commissioners of Yakima county duly ordered the issuance of emergency current expense fund warrants in the amount of $26,602.53, to supplement the budget for the year 1934. In 1935, they duly ordered the issuance of similar warrants in the amount of $104,082.31, to supplement the budget for that year. Likewise, in 1935, they authorized the issuance of emergency old age pension warrants in the amount of $9,288.50.

The above-mentioned section of the statute authorizes the county commissioners to raise the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Wolff v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richards v. Clark CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API