Flippin v. State

Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of $50.00, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of two years.

Appellant's first and main contention is that the evidence is insufficient to justify and sustain his conviction, inasmuch as the seed, the alleged stolen property, were not identified as the seed that were stolen from Mr. Forbess.

It is true that the State relied entirely upon circumstantial evidence for a conviction, but we think that the circumstances proved are sufficient to connect the appellant with the…