Legal Opinion

Neely & Co. v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1912PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint.. Before Judge Littlejohn. Schley superior court. April 10, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

1. The authority of an agent to execute a sealed instrument must itself be under seal, although the instrument may evidence a contract not required by law to be under seal; and ratification of such instrument, to be binding upon the principal, must also be under seal. Overman v. Atkinson, 102 Ga. 750, and citations; Lynch v. Poole, ante, 303 (75 S. E. 158), and citations.

2. By the terms of a contract under seal N. & Co. purchased from 8., who signed the contract and agreed to deliver, at a certain price, 50 bales of cotton, within a given time and at a stated place. The contract was executed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sivell v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Huggins v. Southeastern Lime & Cement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Lynch v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Overman v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BurnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. United Leather Co. v. ProudfitSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Robson & Evans v. WeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Allen v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Klingbeil v. RenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API