Legal Opinion

Emerich v. New York Central Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the proof does not show any actionable negligence oi; the part of the defendant. (See Saraceni v. Mt. Vernon Trust Co., 246 App. Div. 612, affd. 271 N. Y. 514; Palsgraf v. Long Island R. R. Co., 248 N. Y. 339.) All concur, except Cunningham, P. J., and Dowling, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance on the authority of Bowers v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. (282 N. Y. 442). (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damage for death of plaintiff’s intestate resulting from injuries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Bowers v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Saraceni Ex Rel. Saraceni v. Mount Vernon Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Saraceni v. Mount Vernon Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API