Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Higginbottom
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 4, 1991No. 1-89-3165PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan
Vanice Billups, Robert E. Dawson, William L. Morrison and Howard Zar (the Interveners) appeal from an order denying them attorney fees allegedly due them after they intervened in an action brought by the City of Chicago for building code violations. We affirmed the judgment, and the Interveners filed a petition for rehearing.
On May 8, 1975, the City of Chicago (City) filed a two-count complaint alleging eight violations of the Municipal Code (the Code) existed in a 24-unit apartment building (the Building) at 4710-18 South Woodlawn Avenue in the Hyde Park-Kenwood neighborhood. Named as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greer v. Illinois Housing Development AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Associated Convalescent Enterprises, Inc., United States of America v. Leo Branton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- White v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gum v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Sampson v. MiglinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- In Re MauriceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- In Re General Order of March 15, 1993Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- In Re A.V.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.