Legal Opinion

State v. M. Krebs

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2016No. DA 15-0287PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Marte Krebs and the State contest whether one of Krebs’s prior convictions is a “qualifying conviction” that allowed the State to charge him with a felony for his most recent driving under the influence (DUI) violation. Krebs challenged the prior conviction’s applicability, arguing that the State failed to meet its burden of showing that the prior conviction could be used to enhance the penalty for his conviction to a felony. The District Court disagreed and imposed a felony sentence.

¶2 We reverse because the State had the burden of demonstrating the existence of qualifying convictions for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. OklandMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. MaineMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. BranderMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SidmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. B. WattsMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Missoula v. J. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. D. RasmussenMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. P. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. C. WellknownMontana Supreme Court · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API