Winter v. Schneider
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
For reversal of this ease defendant relies upon one proposition, which is:
“That the trial court erred in holding that one purchasing school land through the Land Department is bound by the record of a mortgage which is not recorded in the office of the School Land Department.”
In his argument under this proposition defendant cites and quotes sections 9331, 9385, and 9396, Oomp. Stat. 1921, and insists that these sections have application to the mortgage in the instant case. These identical sections .have been heretofore considered by this court in the case of First…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First Nat. Bank of Butler v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Johnson v. FARMER'S UNION CO-OP. ROYALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Carter Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.