Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 2010No. 10-CV-20Published

1Dissent

FISHER, Associate Judge,

with whom WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, and GLICKMAN and OBERLY, Associate Judges, join, dissenting:

This appeal is about legislative authority — that vested in the Council of the District of Columbia and that granted to the voters at large. In 1978, five years after the Home Rule Act transformed governance in the District of Columbia, the Council, the voters, and the Congress of the United States, acting in collaboration, amended the District Charter (Title IV of the Home Rule Act) for the first time, creating the right of initiative so that the voters themselves could…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API