Legal Opinion

George v. M & G Testing and Services, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1995No. 95-31PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

663 So.2d 79 (1995)

Lumus GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

M & G TESTING AND SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-31.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 19, 1995.

Limited Rehearing Granted December 14, 1995.[*]

Alfred Frem Boustany, II, Lafayette, for Lumus George.

Philip E. Roberts, Lafayette, for M & G Testing and Service.

Before LABORDE, WOODARD and AMY, JJ.

WOODARD, Judge.

This appeal arises from a finding that plaintiff, Lumus George, was disabled and awarding him benefits, surgery, penalties, and attorney's fees. Defendants, M & G Testing and Services, Inc., and its workers'…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Hampton v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Bailey v. Smelser Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Pitcher v. Hydro-Kem Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tillmon v. Thrasher WaterproofingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Faul v. BoninLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Miller v. Byles Welding & Tractor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Riser v. Acadiana Limousine ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINIST. v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API