Legal Opinion

People v. Hassan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*741Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was not valid (see People v Monsuri, 83 AD3d 870 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 808 [2011]; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569 [2010], lv granted 15 NY3d 896 [2010]) and, therefore, the purported waiver does not bar review of the defendant’s claim.

Nevertheless, following the pretrial Mapp hearing (see Mapp v Ohio, 367 US 643 [1961]), the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Under the fellow officer rule, if an arresting officer lacks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. People v. Ramirez-PortorealNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. BayardNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. MonsuriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. BerrouetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HollmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. HollmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API