Legal Opinion
Filipek v. Oakton Cmty. Coll.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided February 27, 2018No. Case No. 16 C 2902; C/w : Case No. 16 C 3215, Consolidated with: Case No. 16 C 6812PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, United States District Judge
In November 2014, Oakton Community College announced that as of July 1, 2015, it would no longer employ any person receiving an annuity from the State Universities Retirement System (SURS). Affected SURS annuitants-all of whom worked at Oakton as part-time, or adjunct, faculty members prior to July 2015-filed three separate lawsuits against Oakton. Daniel Filipek and Donald Krzyzak have each alleged that Oakton's decision not to employ SURS annuitants violates the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623, and the Illinois…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bayer v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Emmanouil v. West Aurora School District 129District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024