Meidel v. Ford Motor Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: When Special Term struck this case from the Trial Calendar pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1024.8 and permitted discovery to continue, it effectively placed the parties in a pre-note-of-issue status. By striking the case from the calendar, the note of issue and nonjury demand also fell. Therefore, the court erred when it conditioned restoration "as a non-jury cause”. The order of *992restoration pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1024.13 (c) requires a new note of issue and statement of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fleischer v. Institute for Research in HypnosisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Mazzara v. Town of PittsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradley v. KonakanchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017