Legal Opinion
Bertrang v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1971No. State 169PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The pivotal issue on this review is whether an oral statement allegedly made by the victim to her mother the day after the event was hearsay, and if so, whether it was improperly received in testimony.
At trial Mrs. Bertrang was called by the state, and on cross-examination the following occurred:
“Q. Directing your attention to Saturday morning, after you talked to Tammy and discovered blood in her panties, did you discuss the blood with her? You can answer that ‘Yes’ or ‘No.’ A. No, I didn’t discuss the blood.
“Q. Did you inquire as to whether or not something had happened? A. Yes.
“Q. Please…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bridges v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. BoodryArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Pruss v. StrubeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Hannon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Bannen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Leatherwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.